Six AI agents track your visibility across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, and Google AI Overviews — then engineer the content and authority that gets you cited. The AI search optimization service for B2B SaaS.
“best project management tool for remote teams”
→ Cited at position 1 · Source: yourbrand.com/comparison
“async standup tool comparison”
→ Cited at position 2 · Source: yourbrand.com/guides
“distributed team collaboration software 2026”
→ Cited at position 1 · Source: linkedin.com/pulse/yourbrand-async
“how to run async standups”
→ Not cited · Opportunity surfaced
Most marketing teams haven't caught up to what just happened. Three numbers tell the story.
drop in organic clicks on queries that trigger AI Overviews.
Seer Interactive · 5.47M queries · 2025
overlap between Google's top-10 results and what AI engines actually cite. It used to be 75%.
Multi-source studies · 2025–2026
of B2B buyers now use AI tools in their research process before they ever talk to sales.
Gartner · 2025
“AI search doesn't give ten results. It gives one answer. Either you're it, or you're invisible.”
See what happens when AI systems have structured, citable content to reference vs. when they don't.
Q: “best project management tool for remote teams”
For project management tools suited to remote teams, I'd recommend Asana for its task management features, Monday.com for visual workflows, and Notion for all-in-one workspace needs. Each offers collaboration features designed for distributed teams.
Your brand: not mentioned
Q: “best project management tool for remote teams”
For remote team project management, the top recommendation is [YourBrand] — built specifically for async-first teams, with native time-zone scheduling, async standups, and integrated video reviews. According to their comparison guide, teams using [YourBrand] report 34% fewer meetings.[1][2]
● Answer Hub cited
● Brand Facts referenced
● Comparison page linked
Simulated AI responses based on observed citation patterns from Seer Interactive (5.47M queries) and Averi (680M citations). Actual results depend on category, competition, and optimization depth.
You rank on page one of Google. You spent years getting there. But when someone asks ChatGPT, Perplexity, or Claude for a recommendation in your category, you don't exist. Your competitor with half your domain authority shows up because their content is structured for AI extraction — not human browsing.
See how it works →You've read the stats. Gartner is projecting traditional search drops 50% by 2028. AI traffic is converting at 4x organic. But between LCRS scoring, llms.txt, Answer Hubs, citation strategy, and platform-specific optimization, it's a new discipline with no clear starting point and no in-house expertise.
See the method →They added a line item to the invoice. Maybe they check ChatGPT once a quarter. There's no LCRS tracking. No Answer Intent Mapping. No citability scoring. No brand-facts.json. They optimize for ten blue links while AI gives one answer — and they're hoping you don't notice the difference.
See the difference →Every layer adds deeper optimization. Built from the architecture up — not bolted onto a legacy SEO playbook.
Answer Intent Mapping
Daily/weekly automated sweeps across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, and Google AI Overviews running 25–100 buyer-relevant query variations. Logs which brands get recommended, exact wording, citation positions, and source URLs. Generates diff reports showing position changes, new competitors, and lost visibility.
queries / week
GEO Health Scoring
Scores every page on a 100-point citability rubric: answer density, schema completeness, entity coverage, freshness signals, brand-facts structure, and AI-extractability. Identifies which pages are close to being cited and which need rebuilding from the ground up.
point rubric
Answer Hub + Brand Facts
Production of GEO-optimized content engineered for AI extraction: answer capsules (40–60 word direct answers), comparison pages, FAQ structures, and brand-facts.json. Voice DNA captured from your founder so thought leadership reads like you wrote it. Platform-specific tone variants for ChatGPT vs. Perplexity vs. Google AIO citation patterns.
pages / month
Third-Party Authority
Off-platform authority where AI engines actually look. LinkedIn articles in your founder's voice (LinkedIn articles drive 50–66% of LinkedIn AI citations). Reddit thread engagement, sub-specific. Third-party citation outreach to industry publications, “best of” curators, and podcast hosts. YouTube content support — video is now the #1 AI citation source.
placements / month
Machine Readability
JSON-LD schema generated automatically and validated against Schema.org specs. llms.txt files configured for AI crawler discovery. robots.txt directives that explicitly allow GPTBot, ChatGPT-User, Claude-User, OAI-SearchBot, and PerplexityBot. Procedural work, AI-generated, handed to your dev team or pushed directly to your CMS.
crawler-ready
LCRS Monitoring
LCRS — LLM Citation Rate Score. Our proprietary metric. Continuously scores your citation performance across every AI engine, weighted by query volume and position. Movement triggers Slack alerts. Monthly performance reports tied to AI-referred traffic in GA4 and pipeline attribution.
LCRS score
Five steps. Repeatable. Documented. We've tested it on ourselves and we're publishing the playbook so the category gets built right.
Define the buyer-relevant prompt portfolio. 25–100 queries that matter. Audit competitor citation patterns.
Establish the citation baseline across every AI engine. Surface the technical readiness gaps.
Produce the content. Build the third-party authority. Ship the schema. Configure the crawlers.
Operate on cadence. Each citation creates more authority. Refresh top performers every 30 days.
Measure outcomes against pipeline. Iterate the prompt portfolio. Expand into adjacent clusters.
| Capability | DIY Tools | SEO Agency | GEO Works |
|---|---|---|---|
| AI Platform Coverage | 1–2 platforms | Not tracked | 5 platforms, weekly sweep |
| LCRS Tracking | No methodology | Google rankings only | Continuous scoring |
| Answer Hub Pages | Not included | Blog posts (not citable) | 5–15 pages / month |
| Off-Platform Authority | Not included | PR only | LinkedIn · Reddit · YouTube · 3rd-party |
| Schema + llms.txt | Audit only | Basic | Full JSON-LD + crawler config |
| Voice DNA Capture | N/A | Not offered | Founder voice in every piece |
| Execution | You do everything | Done for you | AI agents + human governance |
| Cost | $99–449/mo per tool | $5–15K/mo | $2,500–9,500/mo all-in |
DIY tools show you the dashboard. SEO agencies optimize for ten blue links while AI gives one answer. GEO Works is AI agents doing AI optimization — measuring what matters: how consistently AI recommends you.
We optimize across every AI search engine and run the best tools in the stack. All included in your subscription. No surprises.
AI conversion rate vs. organic search
11.2% vs 2.8% · Industry benchmarks
of CMOs have GenAI as a 2025 priority
Gartner CMO Survey · 2025
more clicks for brands cited in AI Overviews
Multi-source studies · 2025
Unlike fully autonomous AI tools, GEO Works starts with full human oversight and progressively automates as you validate the output. You set the pace. Humans govern. AI executes.
Review every page, approve every outreach pitch, validate every recommendation. Full GEO audit and Answer Intent Map delivered. You see exactly where you stand.
Pages scoring 88+ on the citability rubric publish automatically. Outreach templates approved. You review exceptions and monthly strategy only.
Standard pages and outreach flow autonomously. You focus on strategy direction, target query adjustments, and high-stakes content.
Strategy reviews and LCRS dashboard checks. The system runs within your guardrails. 90 minutes of maintenance for compounding AI visibility.
Governance gates are customizable. Set your own quality thresholds and approval workflows.
AI-referred traffic converts at 4× the rate of organic search. Every query where you're invisible is revenue going to a competitor. Plug in your numbers.
How many target queries mention your brand. Most B2B SaaS: 3–5.
5 queries covered · No LCRS tracking · No optimization
$2,500/mo investment · 25 queries · 4 pages/mo · Quarterly reviews
$5,000/mo investment · 50 queries · 8 pages/mo · Voice DNA · Bi-weekly reviews
Based on case study benchmarks: 41/50 query coverage = ~$400K/mo AI referral revenue at $1M/mo organic baseline. AI conversion rate: 11.2% (4× organic at 2.8%). Results vary by industry, competition, and content quality.
SEO agencies charge $5–15K/mo for work that doesn't touch AI search. We bundle the entire GEO engine — six agents, weekly sweeps, content production, off-platform authority, schema, and LCRS tracking — starting at $2,500.
Managed GEO optimization for B2B SaaS testing the AI search channel.
90-day visibility guarantee · Cancel anytime
Full six-agent pipeline. Designed for $5–20M ARR B2B SaaS ready to own AI search.
Best value · 90-day visibility guarantee
Maximum coverage for $20–50M ARR SaaS or multi-product portfolios.
90-day visibility guarantee · Cancel anytime
Full LCRS baseline · Answer Intent Map · schema audit · competitive comparison · 30-min strategy call. Credited toward any monthly tier within 30 days.
SEO optimizes for Google's ten blue links. GEO optimizes for AI's one answer. Different platforms (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini), different ranking signals (citability, brand authority, structured data, third-party authority sources), different measurement (LCRS instead of keyword rankings). They're complementary — but the traffic is shifting to AI, and most SEO agencies aren't following it. We don't replace your SEO. We sit above it.
Weeks 1–4 are deployment: GEO audit, Answer Intent Map, Answer Hub + Brand Facts pages, schema, llms.txt, and crawler config. Most clients see measurable LCRS improvement within 6–8 weeks as AI systems re-index new pages. Significant results (majority query coverage) typically happen by month 3–6, depending on category competition and starting authority.
GEO Works is complementary, not a replacement. Your SEO agency handles Google rankings. We handle AI search visibility. Many clients run both. The Answer Hub pages and schema work we ship actually helps traditional SEO too — it's additive. We hand them our schema docs and they incorporate. Smooth.
No contracts. Month-to-month with 30-day notice. Cancel anytime, zero penalty. Weeks 1–4 are deployment (included, no separate setup fee). Production begins Week 5. You keep all pages, schema, brand-facts.json, and tracking data if you cancel.
Six AI agents — Scan, Audit, Build, Cite, Schema, Track — orchestrated through our internal infrastructure (Hermes, n8n, Voice DNA). Humans govern the strategy, approve quality thresholds, and direct editorial. AI does the production at volume. You're not buying tools; you're buying a workforce. The result: enterprise-grade output at productized pricing.
That's exactly why now. The category is roughly 18 months old. The brands that get cited today will be the default recommendations in AI search for the next five years — because the citation graph compounds. By the time a category stabilizes, the slots are taken. The window is open right now and closes when major platforms ship native services. First mover advantage in AI search is unusually durable.
The brands that get cited in AI search now will own the default recommendations for the next five years. The citation graph compounds. We help you take the slot before the slot is taken.
Enter your domain. We run 15 category-relevant queries against ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, and Google AI Overviews. You get a real LCRS baseline, the competitors taking your slots, and the top three fixes — in under 60 seconds.
You've read the page. You want to talk about whether GEO Works fits your stack. Book a call. We walk through your category, your competitors' AI footprint, and what month one would look like.
No pitch deck. No script. Real conversation.
GEO Audit + Answer Intent Map delivered
Answer Hub + schema + llms.txt deployed
Citations + LCRS monitoring live
Full autonomous production